A primary element that has separated the United States of America from virtually every other nation in history is the concept of it being “a nation of laws, not a nation of men.”
“A nation of laws” means that laws, not people, rule. Everyone is to be governed by the same laws, regardless of their station; whether it is the most common American or Members of Congress, high-ranking bureaucrats or the President of the United States; all must be held to the just laws of America. No one is, or can be allowed to be, above the law.
We are a country of laws. However, the men who wrote the law had their own best interests in mind when writing those laws. The wealthy elite from our country's history, those names you would know from history books, created a legal system that worked to their advantage and against everyone they excluded from the benefits of the law.
From a practical point of view, our laws are too many and too technical to serve the people of this country. The laws are abusive and were created either to offer benefit to one group of citizens or to penalize another group. Most laws in this country have nothing to do with the concept of justice. Ultimately, the laws are interpreted and selective enforced by a political system completely alien to justice.
To make the statement, "it's the law" is absolutely meaningless. It only refers to what is written in the books and nothing more. "Fairness", something much more easily understood by the citizenry, has no relationship to 'the law'...
Case in Point: Seems the Trumpster Fire isn't going to deport those millions of "rapists," "gang members," "violent criminals," and "drug dealers" he's always incoherently ranting about.
Instead, his first victim is Guadalupe Garcia de Rayos, a 36-year-old Phoenix mother of two teenagers and American citizens who has lived peaceably in Arizona for 22 years. She was brought here from Mexico at 14, got caught working at a water park using a fake social security number during a 2008 raid by famed freedom lover, racial profiler and then-sheriff Joe Arpaio, has since regularly checked in every six months as required with Immigration and Customs officials, did so yesterday after praying at church, but was suddenly detained last night under Trump's deranged new rules. As her crying children and scores of protesters chanted "This Is Wrong" and "Set Her Free!", Garcia de Rayos was locked in a van, driven away, and detained. Today, officials said she had already been deported to Nogales, Mexico. Feel safer yet?
The people of this country recognize and honor 'fairness'. This is why Chelsea Manning has been so inspirational. The transgender leader and military whistleblower has provided a view of our own cruel and brutal relations with the world. She gave 700,000 classified U.S. State and Defense Department documents to WikiLeaks including a video showing a U.S. military helicopter attack in Baghdad that killed two journalists and several Iraqi civilians. And then she was imprisoned for telling the truth.
During her incarceration, Manning was subject to solitary confinement and repeatedly denied basic healthcare. We all knew that her treatment was 'unfair', and we are all glad for her release.
Maybe, in spite of other circumstances, the laws relating to impeachment will be kinder to the American citizen.
Two new polls reflect poorly on President Donald Trump's brief tenure in the Oval Office, with one showing his administration is tarnishing Americans' view of U.S. popularity around the world, and another finding voters are already evenly divided on the issue of impeaching the president. The Gallup poll released Friday finds Americans believe the world at-large sees the U.S. more unfavorably (57 percent) than favorably (42 percent)—the worst assessment of the country's image in almost 10 years. "The 42 percent favorable rating is one of the lowest since Gallup began asking this question in 2000 and may be attributable to the election of Trump, whose sometimes controversial statements and actions have rankled several world leaders," the polling outfit wrote.
We are finally waking up to reality about our very hurtful 'drug laws'. Marijuana is now legal for recreational or medicinal use in more than half the country. At the same time, we have the largest prison population in the world due to our 'enforcement' of our 'laws'. The history of those 'drug laws' demonstrates the total lack of 'fairness' in our legal process.
Of course, in the United States, citizens have absolutely no voice regarding the law or fairness. It is the supreme court who has jurisdiction in these areas. And, while on occasion, one might agree with a supreme court decision, the overall thrust is negative for the average citizen. For example, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer has spoken against mandatory minimum sentences, and yet our prisons are full of helpless victims of the law.
In one way or another, we are all victims of legislators 'laws' and Supreme Court interpretations. Here are a few of the most egregious Supreme Court Rulings... you may want to look these up in order to truly understand how our system of 'laws' actually works.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1856)
Pace v. Alabama (1883) The Civil Rights Cases (1883) Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Cumming v. Richmond (1899) Ozawa v. United States (1922) United States v. Thind (1923) Lum v. Rice (1927) Hirabayashi v. United States (1943) Korematsu v. United States (1944)
When one reads the background of these cases, one is forced to wonder if it is even possible for justice and fairness to have a place at the table in this great country... the answer is 'no' and that's the truth !!!
|
It makes perfectly good sense. If one wants to control the population, one needs to control the information received by that population. As 'great leaders' are aware, the truth is what we say it is. Facts are as we share them with the world. The 'truth' is defined by facts as presented by us.
We do actually know the truth. Saddam’s cache of 'weapons of mass destruction' did not exist. Those in official Washington simply insisted these weapons did exist. This 2015 poll from Fairleigh Dickinson University shows that tons of people still believe it, even today.
"Overall, 42 percent of Americans believe that U.S. forces found active weapons of mass destruction program in Iraq. Republicans are more likely to hold this belief than Democrats: Fifty-one percent of Republicans think it’s “probably” or “definitely” true that an active program was found after the 2003 invasion, with 14 percent saying that it was definitely true. Still, large portions of other groups think that the WMD program, a major part of the justification for the invasion, was actually found, including 32 percent of Democrats."
"Overall, 42 percent of Americans believe that U.S. forces found active weapons of mass destruction program in Iraq. Republicans are more likely to hold this belief than Democrats: Fifty-one percent of Republicans think it’s “probably” or “definitely” true that an active program was found after the 2003 invasion, with 14 percent saying that it was definitely true. Still, large portions of other groups think that the WMD program, a major part of the justification for the invasion, was actually found, including 32 percent of Democrats."
"... war propaganda is hardly unprecedented and America has deployed it as often as any country. From the Hearst yellow journalism that ginned up support for the Spanish-American War to the Gulf of Tonkin incident in Vietnam, the United States government used such tactics to gain public support for wars overseas."
"labeling anything they disagree with, including the fact-check sites like Snopes or Factcheck.org, as “fake news.” Millions of people have been conditioned to believe their claims for years, which means polarization is only likely to get worse. If Americans can’t even agree which facts are real, it’s hard to see how we’re going to be able to govern ourselves."
America's Corporate press humiliated in world ranking as it drops to number 49 in terms of 'free press' status...
War on Truth "A Funeral Pyre for Science"
from The World Can't Wait
The Trump cabal of religious extremists, privatization advocates and racists, as described by Jeremy Scahill, suppresses the science that doesn't fit its agenda, "and that should terrify you," reports Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Michael Hiltzik. "Nearly every day brings a new report of a federal agency told to shut down communications with the public or even members of Congress; tweets about important topics such as climate change removed from the public record; bans on talking to the press."
"Among the first agencies reported to face an information lockdown were the departments of Agriculture and the Interior," continues Hiltzik. "Scientists and other staffers at USDA's Agricultural Research Service, its main scientific arm, were told Monday to stop releasing 'any public-facing documents', including 'news releases, photos, fact sheets, news feeds, and social media content ... until further notice', according to an internal email published by BuzzFeed. Following a public uproar, the ban was rescinded a day later."
Donald Trump started with climate change denial, and proceeded, rapidly, to fetter directives of the Environmental Protection Agency. "We're living in a new era, where an unverified report about possible, unsubstantiated rumors of alleged, unconfirmed evidence hacked from an undisclosed source competes on an equal footing with real information," notes Dr. Brian Moench, President of Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment and a member of the Union of Concerned Scientists. "Trump's strategy is clearly an attempt to delegitimize any source of information that has the temerity to challenge or tarnish him." In keeping with its overall fascist direction and agenda, the new regime is attacking the foundation of the public's ability to engage in critical thinking: a scientific, evidence-based approach to reality.
The Trump regime's actions to shut down communications by dozens of federal agencies has not gone unopposed. A number of so-called rogue twitter accounts have sprung up to communicate information directly to the public. While all of them can't be verified, an interview has been published with the people behind @ActualEPAFacts, who explained why they took this unprecedented, and potentially career-killing, step:
We all work on climate change research and grant administration. Knowing that our department is not valued by the person who may be leading the agency worries us. Our jobs are at stake. We wanted to be sure that science, real science, continues to have a voice. When the information was deleted from the Badlands NPS site it felt very Orwellian.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears," wrote George Orwell in 1949. "It was their final, most essential command."
from The World Can't Wait
The Trump cabal of religious extremists, privatization advocates and racists, as described by Jeremy Scahill, suppresses the science that doesn't fit its agenda, "and that should terrify you," reports Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Michael Hiltzik. "Nearly every day brings a new report of a federal agency told to shut down communications with the public or even members of Congress; tweets about important topics such as climate change removed from the public record; bans on talking to the press."
"Among the first agencies reported to face an information lockdown were the departments of Agriculture and the Interior," continues Hiltzik. "Scientists and other staffers at USDA's Agricultural Research Service, its main scientific arm, were told Monday to stop releasing 'any public-facing documents', including 'news releases, photos, fact sheets, news feeds, and social media content ... until further notice', according to an internal email published by BuzzFeed. Following a public uproar, the ban was rescinded a day later."
Donald Trump started with climate change denial, and proceeded, rapidly, to fetter directives of the Environmental Protection Agency. "We're living in a new era, where an unverified report about possible, unsubstantiated rumors of alleged, unconfirmed evidence hacked from an undisclosed source competes on an equal footing with real information," notes Dr. Brian Moench, President of Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment and a member of the Union of Concerned Scientists. "Trump's strategy is clearly an attempt to delegitimize any source of information that has the temerity to challenge or tarnish him." In keeping with its overall fascist direction and agenda, the new regime is attacking the foundation of the public's ability to engage in critical thinking: a scientific, evidence-based approach to reality.
The Trump regime's actions to shut down communications by dozens of federal agencies has not gone unopposed. A number of so-called rogue twitter accounts have sprung up to communicate information directly to the public. While all of them can't be verified, an interview has been published with the people behind @ActualEPAFacts, who explained why they took this unprecedented, and potentially career-killing, step:
We all work on climate change research and grant administration. Knowing that our department is not valued by the person who may be leading the agency worries us. Our jobs are at stake. We wanted to be sure that science, real science, continues to have a voice. When the information was deleted from the Badlands NPS site it felt very Orwellian.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears," wrote George Orwell in 1949. "It was their final, most essential command."