Thursday, September 14, 2017

 
Picture
We are going to squeeze even tighter... they can't hold out much longer.  We will demonstrate to the entire world, as if they didn't all already know the truth, we are in control... we are in charge... we call the shots... we are the 'superpower'... you will do as we say do or you will suffer the consequences.
Or, from a slightly different perspective: if we can't have our way, perhaps we will just shot ourselves in the foot and limp around for a while.
Russia’s Ambassador to the United Nations Vassily Nebenzia said that Russia doubts the sanctions' ability to hit the intended target, “financial and economic measures of pressure on the DPRK leadership are almost exhausted, and further restrictions can amount to an attempt to strangle the country’s economy, impose a total blockade, and provoke a deep humanitarian crisis. In other words, this is not about blocking the channels for boosting the banned missile and nuclear activities, but about inflicting unacceptable harm on completely innocent civilian population.”
Just ahead of the Security Council meeting, the North Korean foreign ministry warned it will be forced to retaliate using “ultimate means,” should stricter sanctions follow.

“In case the US eventually does rig up the illegal and unlawful 'resolution' on harsher sanctions, the DPRK [Democratic People's Republic of Korea] shall make absolutely sure that the US pays due price,” the ministry's statement read, according to the state-run KCNA news agency.

“The DPRK is ready and willing to use any form of ultimate means. The forthcoming measures to be taken by the DPRK will cause the US the greatest pain and suffering it had ever gone through in its entire history,” the statement added.
"It is clear that it is impossible to solve the problems of the Korean peninsula by sanctions alone and pressure," Russian President Vladimir Putin said at the economic forum in Vladivostok following talks with South Korean President Moon Jae-in last week.

"One shouldn’t give in to emotions and drive North Korea into a corner," Putin stated, adding that everyone now needs to show composure, avoiding “steps that lead to an escalation of tension.”
“We have lived under US sanctions for decades. Under the harshest of sanctions. But we have acquired everything we wanted to. If the US hopes that our position would be shaken and changed, that is an illusion,” Kim Yong-jae, North Korea ambassador to Moscow, told the Russian media.

The diplomat added that North Korea’s nuclear and rocket programs will help his country better deter the “hostile policy of the US” and protect the Korean Peninsula from a nuclear war.

“The sanctions resolution of the UN Security Council has been forced by the US, which uses the council as a tool, and is illegal. We fully reject and strongly condemn this resolution,” Ambassador Kim said.
“Instead of acknowledging the reality and making the right choice, the US is using our most justified measures of self-defense to try and strangle our country,” he said.
North Korea “is ready and willing to use any form of ultimate means”  in response, the ministry said.
“The forthcoming measures to be taken by the DPRK will cause the US the greatest pain and suffering it had ever gone through in its entire history,” the statement said. “The world will witness how the DPRK tames the US gangsters by taking series of action tougher than they have ever envisaged.”

Beijing and Moscow are doubtful about mounting more sanctions pressure on Pyongyang, believing it will not stop its nuclear and rocket development.

“As I told my colleagues yesterday, they [North Koreans] will eat grass, but will not stop their program as long as they do not feel safe,” Russian President Vladimir Putin explained after a meeting of BRICS leaders in China.

"There is no other way to solve the North Korean nuclear issue, save that of peaceful dialogue.”
Pyongyang will not relinquish its military program under pressure of sanctions and military threats, because the examples of Iraq and Libya have convinced it that nuclear deterrence is the only credible way to ensure its security, President Putin told journalists on Tuesday.

“Ramping up military hysteria in such conditions is senseless; it’s a dead end,” he added. “It could lead to a global, planetary catastrophe and a huge loss of human life. There is no other way to solve the North Korean nuclear issue, save that of peaceful dialogue.”
Is there anyone in Trump's government who is not an imbecile?

After years of endless military threats against Russia -- remember CIA deputy director Mike Morell saying on TV (Charlie Rose show) that the US should start killing Russians to give them a message, and Army Chief of Staff Mark Milley threatening "We'll beat you harder than you have ever been beaten before" -- now the US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin threatens China. If China doesn't abide by Washington's new sanctions on North Korea, Mnuchin said the US "will put additional sanctions on them [China] and prevent them from assessing the US and international dollar system."

Here is the broke US government $20 trillion in public debt, having to print money with which to buy its own bonds, threatening the second largest economy in the world, an economy on purchasing power parity terms that is larger than the US economy.

Take a moment to think about Mnuchin's threat to China. How many US firms are located in China? It is not only Apple and Nike. Would sanctions on China mean that the US firms could not sell their Chinese-made products in the US or anywhere outside China? Do you think the global US corporations would stand for this?

What if China responded by nationalizing all US factories and all Western owned banks in China and Hong Kong?

Mnuchin is like the imbecile Nikki Haley. He doesn't know who he is threatening.

Consider Mnuchin's threat to exclude China from the international dollar system. Nothing could do more harm to the US and more good to China. A huge amount of economic transactions would simply exit the dollar system, reducing its scope and importance. Most importantly, it would finally dawn on the Chinese and Russian governments that being a part of the dollar system is a massive liability with no benefits. Russia and China should years ago have created their own system. Being part of Washington's system simply lets Washington make threats and impose sanctions.
China has become a banking powerhouse.  Four of the five largest banks in the world are Chinese. 
The circumstances are similar to the boiler-plate cartoon wherein the idiot pokes at the sleeping dragon with a stick.  The United States is in the same position as the idiot.  The only hope is that the dragon doesn't wake up, and that's the truth !!!
Picture
and if trade sanctions don't work...
US threatens to ‘cut China off’ from dollar if it does not uphold sanctions against N. Korea

from RT

The US could impose economic sanctions on China if it does not implement the new sanctions regime against North Korea, the US Treasury Secretary has warned. Steven Mnuchin said the restrictions could involve cutting off Beijing’s access to the US financial system.“North Korea economic warfare works,” Mnuchin said Tuesday at the Delivering Alpha Conference in New York City. “We sent a message that anybody who wanted to trade with North Korea – we would consider them not trading with us.”

The Treasury Secretary echoed the words of the US envoy to the UN, Nikki Haley, by calling the fresh round of sanctions against Pyongyang “historic.” Mnuchin added “if China doesn’t follow these sanctions, we will put additional sanctions on them and prevent them from accessing the US and international dollar system.”

Washington has, so far, been reluctant to impose economic sanctions on China over concerns of possible retaliatory measures from Beijing and the potentially catastrophic consequences for the global economy.

Washington runs a $350 billion annual trade deficit with Beijing. China also holds $1 trillion in US debt, which amounts to 28 percent of US Treasury bills, notes and bonds held by a foreign government.   US lawmakers, however, seemed to be more inclined to exert pressure on Beijing and other countries striking deals with Pyongyang as they demand a “supercharged” response to North Korea’s nuclear tests, including imposing sanctions on companies from China and any other country doing business in North Korea.

“I believe the response from the United States and our allies should be supercharged,” said Ed Royce, chairman of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee during a hearing Tuesday.

“We need to use every ounce of leverage... to put maximum pressure on this rogue regime,” he said, adding that “time is running out.” Royce also called on Washington to target major Chinese banks, including the Agricultural Bank of China and the China Merchants Bank for dealing with Pyongyang.

​He also said China was apparently reluctant to follow through on the sanctions adopted by the UN Security Council (UNSC) against the North. “It’s been a long, long time of waiting for China to comply with the sanctions that we pass and, frankly, with the sanctions that the United Nations passed,” he said.

The committee chair went on to say the US could give Chinese banks and companies “a choice between doing business with North Korea or the United States.” He added that the US should also “go after banks and companies in other countries that do business with North Korea the same way.”

Committee members also expressed unease over the fact that the sanctions imposed on North Korea have so far been ineffective in preventing Pyongyang from developing its nuclear and missile programs.

“We’ve been played by the Kims for years,” Republican Representative Ted Poe said, referring to North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and his predecessors, as reported by Reuters.

President Donald Trump also downplayed the role of the newly adopted sanctions later Tuesday. ”We think it’s just another very small step, not a big deal. I don’t know if it has any impact,” he told reporters at the start of a meeting with Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak.

Trump also said he already discussed the issue with his State Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. He ominously added that “those sanctions are nothing compared to what ultimately will have to happen” without specifying what he meant by that.

The UNSC unanimously approved a new resolution on sanctions against Pyongyang on September 11. Following a series of behind-the-scenes negotiations Sunday, diplomats agreed not to ban oil exports into North Korea. Instead, the ninth set of restrictive sanctions against Pyongyang authorized an annual cap of 2 million barrels of refined petroleum products to North Korea.

It also banned the North’s textile exports – the second-biggest export for the country, which totals $752 million – according to data from the Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency. Chinese and Russian negotiators managed to persuade the US delegation not to impose a travel ban or asset freeze on North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-un.

On Tuesday, the North Korean ambassador to Moscow said sanctions will not make his country change its policies. Pyongyang’s nuclear program helps it to deter the “hostile policy of the US,” Kim Yong-jae added.
Picture

Wednesday, September 13, 2017

 
Picture
To be really clear, this single statement separated Hillary from both Bernie and 'the Donald' in the perspective of this blog... "Russian aggression"...

Hillary appeared to use that statement as the opening of her speeches, even when the speech was to crooked bankers who were donating to her campaign.  She used that phrase as the body of her speech any time she was speaking, regardless of the audience or of the subject of the speech.   And she used that phrase in the closing of her speeches, even when the speech dealt with domestic issues such as healthcare.  "Russian aggression" was all she seemed to be familiar with and comfortable in discussing.   "Russian aggression", in the perspective of this blog defined her campaign and her promise for the future.   
It was then very easy to foresee her entire presidency as world war three, a nuclear holocaust and the end of human life on planet Earth as we have known it (not the end of all life on the planet).  'Russian aggression'.  Nobody seemed capable of asking, "when did the Russians last attack anyone outside of their own borders?  What 'Russian aggression' might she be referring to?  She seemed obsessed.  
Aside from her, Bernie and Donald were also running in the contest.  As the 'insider', she simply used the Democratic party to push Bernie off of the track even though he was sailing along beautifully, especially in the eyes of the voters.

As a competitor, Donald wasn't really taken seriously as a presidential candidate throughout the entire process of securing the Republican nomination.

But, in the end, 'the system' offered a choice between Hillary or Donald.  Between the entertaining, clownish candidacy of Donald or the war mongering Hillary, people made that choice.
Trump is as bad as imagined, but so far, we are not at war.
It appears that her career has transmuted itself into one of self pity.  Oh! the democratic party treated me badly... Oh! the American voter treated me badly... Oh! I've been cheated out of what was naturally mine!
It is almost as if she wanted to prove that the voters were correct to have rejected her candidacy.  She has written a book in which, essentially, she blames Bernie (among others) for her loss to Donald.  She fails to realize or to accept that, had Democrats allowed Bernie to run against Donald, Bernie almost certainly would have won.  But because of her 'control', because of her history and relations with 'party elite', because of her philosophical alliance with the wealthy, she was championed by Democrats in spite of Bernie's better performance and appeal to the common voter.
Every American still feels the crushing blow delivered by the 'Banksters' who were deemed 'too big to jail' (her pals).  Every American was aware of her relationship with the crooks on wall street as they paid her a small fortune to speak to them (her pals).   Bernie and public consensus wanted to break up the big banks.   Instead of real solutions, Hillary pretended to be interested in a few banking regulations.

Hillary made clear that she favored continued dependence on the private, for profit, insurance industry for America's healthcare. Bernie wanted single-payer.

Hillary had a plan to reduce the cost of higher education for certain lower income students.  Bernie wanted  free higher education for everyone.
At a time when a person must work more than one job and is still not able to 'keep up', and when the jobs come with minimum wages and no benefits, it didn't make sense to campaign as if the system was working perfectly well.  With rampant inequity dominate in our society, it didn't make sense to pretend that everything was good and that we needed more of the same.
That Hillary now is attacking Bernie, claiming that he cost her the election and in the process proving to voters that they were correct to not chose her.  Her vengeance appears misplaced... she should look in the mirror.  Bernie offered what people want and he is the one who should have represented the Democratic party.
But, instead of voters, it was the Democratic party elite who put up a candidate.  Trump looked good by comparison.  Trump won!  He is every bit as bad as was expected.  But, we are not at war,that's on the positive side, and that's the truth !!! 
Picture
going forward, the question to be answered is "did the Democratic party learn anything?"

Monday, September 11, 2017

 
Picture
At Least They Sought Evidence: women thought to be witches were weighed because it was thought that witches had little or no weight... Different from today where we don't want facts to intrude on our ignorance...
It is very difficult to contemplate human beings here on planet Earth.  The messages are so mixed.  There is tremendous evidence that demonstrates the intellectual brilliance with which humans have advanced their cause.  That nature is held in check in many areas is amazing.  We travel in space and in deep oceans.  In some sense, humans now dominate the natural systems and reap fabulous rewards through control of our environment.  We are rushing forward and charging into the future.
Of course, that's one perspective.  Seen from a slightly different angle, that forward thrusting is in fact movement in the wrong direction... moving backwards in reality.
We are attempting to learn less about our lives on Earth.  We are indicating that we no longer want to study things we do.  Apparently, this attitude is our attempt to avoid looking at the truth.  If we don't study our water supply to find out how badly we have poisoned it, for one example, then we can allow ourselves to continue the bad practice of poisoning it.  Presumably, we will not feel so bad if we poison it without knowing we are poisoning it - whereas, one must imagine that if we poisoned our water knowingly, we would feel bad for having done so.
Based upon the logic of the poisoned water supply scenario, we will not know of our situation (only poisoned water to drink) until we are falling over dead from drinking poisoned water.  Or, is there some other possibility?
This type of question comes about as we watch Hurricane Harvey and then Hurricane Irma moving through the southern part of the United States and we simultaneously listen to our political leadership.  A conclusion that seems easy to reach is that our political leadership is demented... seriously demented.  Another conclusion that also seems easy to reach is that we ourselves must be lacking some form of activity between our brain cells.  Do we realize, for instance, in the poisoned water supply example, that we have no other source of water?  ...and, we just stand aside as our political leadership leads us to our doom... there is something wrong with someone's thinking somewhere along the line...
“To have any kind of focus on the cause and effect of the storm; versus helping people, or actually facing the effect of the storm, is misplaced,” Scott Pruitt, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency told CNN, adding that it’s “insensitive” to the people of Florida to focus on climate change at the moment.
The Environmental Protection Agency removed most climate change information from its website to "reflect the approach of new leadership."
The Trump administration dismisses climate change advisory panel.  As explained by one of the panel's members, "The job of this advisory committee was to help federal agencies, state and local governments and the private sector understand all the science and data behind climate change"  It seems clear, we don't want to understand.  Let's move on in ignorance.
We are all familiar with the United States withdrawing from the internationally supported and scientifically supported Paris climate change agreement.
In medieval times we can understand the dominance of ignorance and superstition"1445, in this year was a very strong hail and wind, as never seen before, and it did great damage, [...] and so many women, which it's said to have made the hail and the wind, were burned according to the law."
Today, a special unit of the religious police in Saudi Arabia seeks “sorcerers” and once 'discovered' the penalty is often execution.  In Nigeria, children who are accused of using witchcraft are tortured and killed.  And in the United States of American science is being pushed out of sight in favor of political convenience.
That today we are still dominated by ignorance an superstition is difficult to believe and to accept, but, it's the truth !!!
Picture
Witches Cause A Hailstorm -- illustration from the "De Laniss et phitonicis mulieribus" [Concerning Witches and Sorceresses], by the scholar Ulrich Molitoris, published in 1489. It is curious to note that the first image showing such a scene was published in a book arguing against witchcraft, as most scholars believed that only god was able to change the order of seasons or the weather
Nature Isn't On a Rampage.
That Would Be Us.


By putting the evil eye on nature, we take it off the humans who have science in their hands, but hold it behind their backs.

from Common Dreams by Cynthia Barnett

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has said that a hurricane emergency is not the time to talk about climate change. To the contrary, it is just the time to draw the nation to the conversation.

In 1927, as the muddy waters of the Mississippi River began to recede from what was then the deadliest storm-related flood in American history, blues musicians wailed their sorrow and rage.

Blind Lemon Jefferson recorded his “Rising High Water Blues” that May:
Children stand there screamin: Mama we ain’t got no home
Awww, Mama we ain’t got no home
Papa says to the children, “Backwater left us all alone.”


The gut-wrenching disaster, and others that swept through the Mississippi’s fast-populating basin in the early 20th century, led to more blues devoted to rain and flood than any other natural event. But Papa was wrong: It wasn’t the water that left families homeless and alone.

Under pressure to allow development of the Mississippi’s natural floodplain that once absorbed nearly half the nation’s rainfall, Congress had ignored Progressive Era wisdom that flood control required a mix of reservoirs, levees and preserved wetlands and forests. Instead, lawmakers caved to a levees-only strategy that ushered in what the flood-law scholar Christine A. Klein calls “a century of unnatural disaster.”

By putting the evil eye on nature, we take it off the humans who have science in their hands, but hold it behind their backs.

We’ve long sung our blues, conjured our demons and imagined our enemies in deluges and sky-darkening storms. Even today we imbue the atmosphere with evil intention, like how we once saw swamps as villainous forces. This way of thinking about storms leaves us feeling helpless and also off the hook: The problem is the weather, rather than human decisions that impede safety and drainage, or deny the climate science we need to better understand the atmosphere, including record-breaking tropical storms.

Hurricanes Harvey and Irma did not surprise climate scientists, who have grown hoarse warning that the warming seas and atmosphere will amplify hurricanes and other natural disasters. And yet, media and meteorologists dubbed the exceptional cyclones “monsters,” as if they were spun from a fairy tale rather than hotter-than-usual ocean waters. We have cried “beast” and “zombie storm,” watching Irma break global wind speed records and Harvey the U.S. record for greatest rainfall in a single storm. Fear, perhaps, returns us to the ancient superstitions that named these storms after Huracan, the Carib god of evil.

In his new film on the climate change crisis, “An Inconvenient Sequel,” Al Gore describes the extremes that have drowned cities from Baton Rouge to Bangladesh as “rain bombs,” suggesting an angry god throwing down torrential rains and ruinous floods.

Last year, when Stu Ostro, a meteorologist with the Weather Channel, saw a smiling skull in Hurricane Matthew on infrared satellite imagery, its creepy eye over Haiti, he posted the “sinister-looking face” to Twitter. The skull went viral. The Weather Channel, CNN and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution all assigned reporters to the “story.” Many TV broadcast meteorologists took precious air time to feature it.

We writers are not immune. I was taken aback by this line in a favorite reporter’s story: “The weather appears to be on an unprecedented climate-change-induced rampage.”

But weather is not sinister. It is not on a rampage. It is not the bomb.

In the history of humans and their climate, such misplaced attribution has led to our most profound mistakes. In medieval times, people became convinced during the weather extremes of the Little Ice Age that witches were conjuring the storms. As frightening weather intensified, so did witch trials, torture and executions of thousands of innocent people accused of “weather magic.”

Two hundred years later, British parliament quashed pioneering storm forecasts under pressure from those who thought that the ability to foretell rain was black magic — a fear flamed by ship salvagers who worried predictions would cut into shipwrecks, and their profits. The brilliant Royal Navy vice-admiral who developed the advanced warnings, Robert Fitzroy, committed suicide in the wake of the merciless doubt.

In mid-20th century America, from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to the Everglades of Florida, federal engineers hyped up water as “the fierce, uncompromising enemy.” The propaganda film “Waters of Destiny” breathlessly describes the Army Corps of Engineers’ massive replumbing of the Everglades to save South Florida from “devastating, ruining, havoc-wreaking rains.

In fact, it was the compulsion to vanquish an enemy rather than live in water’s balance that put future generations in grave danger.

Soft rains, torrents and even hurricanes are part of that balance. Hurricanes are essentially giant engines that transfer heat from sea to atmosphere. Scientists are working hard to understand the extent to which global warming may fuel them. Yet at this most crucial time, the Trump administration has purged climate experts, research funding and even the science itself from public websites as if we were back in the witchcraft days.

Lessening the blows of both storm disasters and climate change requires us to see the cycle rather than the Cyclops. Failure to do so will cause more of the same catastrophic destruction and human suffering now occurring in Texas, the Caribbean and Florida.

We are not powerless. Unlike hapless children in a blues song or a fairy tale, there is plenty we can do. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has said that a hurricane emergency is not the time to talk about climate change. To the contrary, it is just the time to draw the nation to the conversation. In recovery mode, we can remake cities to better withstand storms — in ways that help us reduce the carbon emissions warming the planet. We can plan retreat from those parts of the coast becoming unsafe for people. And we can hike investment in the science of climate change so that we can understand, rather than fear.

By putting the evil eye on nature, we take it off the humans who have science in their hands, but hold it behind their backs. The rain is not the bomb. The storms are not the monsters. The weather is not on a rampage. That would be us.

Cynthia Barnett is the author of three books on water including “Rain: A Natural and Cultural History.” She is environmental journalist in residence at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.
Picture

Monday, September 4, 2017

 
Picture
"try counting your money while holding your breath"...
Whatever it is that we are doing is not working to our benefit. We are steadily losing.  The problem can be traced back to our political leadership.  We have chosen certain forms of government under delusional and idealistic terms and we fail to see how unrealistic we have been in our selections.
We like to look at 'human history' starting in 'cave times' and moving forward to 'traveling in space times' and the transition allows us to feel good about the progress we have made as a species.  There we were coughing to death from the smokey cooking fires in our caves and advancing to transplanting body parts in operating rooms.
We have all manner of measurements with which to make the comparisons.  Life expectancy is one example wherein we can demonstrate our undeniable growth.  The human life span has increased for thousands of years all across the planet.   
Travel itself allows one to visit around the world with reasonably managed time requirements.  From walking everywhere to flying from country to country, humans have opened up vast opportunities with improvements in travel and in communications.
Concepts of justice have grown world-wide and allow people from virtually every nation in the world to visit other countries in safety, in a general sense. 
These are examples of the 'positive' side of human 'growth'.  Mostly it's technical and scientific knowledge and application that has made the difference.
The French Revolution of 1789 was a change of direction for the western world.  It expressed ideas of equality.  It caused humans throughout Europe to examine the concept that men should be 'equal in the eyes of the law'. It caused Europe examine the ideas of human rights, political equality, and the rights of women. 
It was a moral revision in humanity's direction.  But, while creating a 'revolution' of thinking across the world, it was overrun by human greed and stupidity.  One can look at the 'Declaration of Independence' as an example of the moral philosophy and one can look at the 'Constitution' of the U.S. for the practical result which abandoned virtually all of the moral philosophy.
"Equal in the eyes of the law" became legislation protecting the privileges of the wealthy class.  Today, that has evolved into 'corporate dominance'.  And, we are still headed downhill.
We are now, with full knowledge of our actions, pursuing goals that will eliminate humanity from the face of the planet.  This level of activity, while taking advantage of our growth in knowledge of many fields of study, ignores the realities of our understanding in other fields of knowledge.
Simple math seems distant to us.  If, for example, atmospheric temperatures of X cause ice to melt and if  Y tons of ice melt and if each ton of melting ice equals Y feet of sea level increase, then, we can plot how many of our cities will be under water within a certain time-frame.  
And, here is where we seem to go wrong.   We have actually done the math and have worked out the answers.  Given our human tendency toward optimism, our answers to mathematical questions are tainted with our optimism.  When science and math provide a 'range' of answers, we almost universally select the answer within the range that makes us feel best and we ignore the range of answers that appears to be unpleasant.
But, even here, we go father in the direction of wrong.  We don't respond to the facts at all.  In Miami, for example, the water is rising all over the city.  The math tells us in no uncertain terms how deep the water will be (within a range).  Yet, the governor of the state and others (Senator Marco Rubio) claim that science is wrong.
And now we are getting to the real problem.  Does our vote have any meaning at all?  Is any part of our so called 'democracy' actually working?  Our elected political officials have gone 100 percent 'greed and stupid' and we all know it.  If we are to have any chance for the future, then we definitely need to make some changes.  We cannot allow these same people to continue to lead us toward mutual destruction.   We've got to do something differently, and that's the truth !!! 
Picture

Saturday, September 2, 2017

Friday, September 1, 2017

     
    Picture
    at the very least, some thinking is involved...
    Essentially, 545 people run this country.  Of this group of people, 536 are elected by the voters of this country - the 9 on the supreme court are placed on the court by the actions of the 536 elected federal officials.
    And, we like to believe that we, in this country, the United States of America, run the world.  Perhaps that explains our predicament.
    Things are going poorly in virtually every aspect of living on this planet, in that 'world' we run.  Currently, there are threats to each component of life.  The food supply, to mention one example, is in serious decline.  In spite of tremendous knowledge about 'farming', there are estimates of a "low" figure of ten thousand daily deaths occurring due to starvation!

    That catastrophic fact is not something that may happen in the future, quite to the contrary, it is happening now and will only get worse.  In the 'developing world', Asia, Africa, and Latin America the threat of mass starvation faces two and a half billion people! 
     
    The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization estimated that one person in every two in the world is badly nourished, and that one in three is chronically hungry.

    Currently there is food available but as climate change takes a stronger hold on the planet, that will no longer be the case... food will be unavailable and those wanting to eat will be forced to participate in 'food riots'.
    And then there's water scarcity.  Water scarcity is the lack of sufficient available water resources to meet water needs.  It affects each continent and around 2.8 billion people around the world at least during parts of every year. More than 1.2 billion people lack access to clean drinking water.
    Water issues are exacerbated by global warming and climate change. Even though our political leaders deny the truth, we are facing altered weather-patterns including droughts and floods, plus increased demand and overuse of water.  
    There are concerns about nuclear war.  There are concerns about artificial intelligence... healthcare... employment.  The list of concerns is long and each concern has a history unique to itself.  We humans have been dealing with (fixing, solving, repairing, over-coming) these issues for our entire history on this planet.

    While we claim to see improvements in human circumstances from prehistory until now, the truth is that, for the first time, we are reasonably well looking at the end of the line... many credible scientific thinkers do not believe humans will finish out this century.
    Our leadership is now and has been leading us downhill.  We have known this as a fact for a long time.  History demonstrates clearly that we have been lied to and deceived at every crossroad as the leadership secures greater and greater profits for themselves.   What idiocy repeatedly votes for these people?  There is nobody to blame other than our own stupidity.   Approval ratings for our political leaders are in the toilet and yet they will all be re-elected... in what we mistakenly pretend is a 'democracy'.
    We've gone through a phase of changing our light bulbs to save ourselves.  We can turn our attention to changing our diets as we increase our efforts at self-salvation.  Becoming vegan is the best thing an individual can do to save the planet.  At the very least, giving up beef is a huge step in the right direction, individually and collectively.
    Mostly, it is out of our hands.  We have created systems wherein our political leadership has all of the power.  Unfortunately, that leadership has demonstrated repeatedly that they cannot be trusted to do the job, any job.  Virtually everything that is wrong is 'their fault' and that's the truth !!!
    Picture
    unfortunately, our thinking and our emotional energy is usually diverted toward silliness by our inept political leadership... if there is any hope, we have got to start paying attention...